Observability¶
Observability is the ability to understand a system's internal state by examining its external outputs. Unlike traditional monitoring that tells you when something is wrong, observability helps you understand why it's wrong—even for problems you've never seen before.
The Three Pillars¶
Observability is built on three complementary data types, each providing a different perspective on system behavior:
graph TD
subgraph "The Three Pillars"
L[Logs]
M[Metrics]
T[Traces]
end
L --> O[Complete Observability]
M --> O
T --> O Logs¶
What they are: Timestamped records of discrete events that happened in your system.
Best for:
- Debugging specific errors and exceptions
- Audit trails and compliance
- Understanding application behavior at a granular level
Example:
2024-01-15T10:23:45Z ERROR [PaymentService] Failed to process payment for order #12345: Card declined
Metrics¶
What they are: Numeric measurements collected at regular intervals.
Best for:
- Tracking trends over time
- Setting up alerts and thresholds
- Capacity planning and resource optimization
Common metrics:
| Metric Type | Examples |
|---|---|
| Counters | Request count, error count |
| Gauges | CPU usage, memory utilization, queue depth |
| Histograms | Response time distribution, payload sizes |
Traces¶
What they are: Records of requests as they flow through distributed systems.
Best for:
- Understanding request flow across services
- Identifying latency bottlenecks
- Debugging distributed system issues
Example trace:
User Request
└─ API Gateway (5ms)
└─ Auth Service (12ms)
└─ Order Service (45ms)
└─ Database Query (30ms)
└─ Payment Service (200ms) ← bottleneck!
How the Pillars Work Together¶
Each pillar provides unique insights, but the real power comes from correlating them:
| Scenario | Start With | Then Use |
|---|---|---|
| "Response times are slow" | Metrics (latency dashboard) | Traces (find slow spans) |
| "Error rate is spiking" | Metrics (error rate alert) | Logs (error details) |
| "Request failed" | Traces (failed span) | Logs (exception stack trace) |
Observability vs. Monitoring¶
| Aspect | Traditional Monitoring | Observability |
|---|---|---|
| Approach | Predefined checks | Exploratory analysis |
| Questions | Known unknowns | Unknown unknowns |
| Data | Aggregated metrics | High-cardinality data |
| Debugging | Dashboard-driven | Query-driven |
Benefits of Observability¶
Faster Incident Resolution¶
With correlated telemetry data, teams can quickly trace issues from symptoms to root causes without guessing or extensive log searching.
Proactive Problem Detection¶
Identify anomalies and degradation before they impact users through intelligent alerting and trend analysis.
Better Collaboration¶
A shared observability platform gives developers, operations, and SRE teams a common view of system health, improving communication and reducing finger-pointing.
Data-Driven Decisions¶
Make informed decisions about architecture, scaling, and optimization based on actual system behavior rather than assumptions.
Frameworks¶
IAPM supports industry-standard observability frameworks:
- OpenTelemetry - The vendor-neutral standard for instrumentation
Next Steps¶
- Learn how to add Instrumentation to your applications
- Understand how Collection gathers telemetry data
- See how Correlation connects your observability data